Supplied letter
Evaluation update: April 17, 2012
- Author
- Sona S. Nast, LCSW, LSOTP
- Recipient
- Rosalinda Vasquez, Travis County CSCD
- Type
- Clinical evaluation letter
- Date
- April 17, 2012
Summary
The letter reports two polygraph examinations with no deception indicated and explains Ms. Nast’s assessment that sex offender treatment did not appear beneficial based on the information available at the time.
What it supports
The first examination addressed whether Dale performed the specific act alleged in the case and reports that he passed. A second, concerning a history of sexual contact with a minor, also showed no deception. Ms. Nast wrote that it appeared he did not have such a history.
What it does not establish
It is not a judicial determination of innocence and does not overturn a conviction. Polygraph results do not, by themselves, establish innocence.
Original supplied letter. Its wording and identifying details are reproduced as provided.
The letter in full
April 17, 2012 · 1 page